arXiv Research Roundup: What the Latest Papers Say About Learning

A tour through recent arXiv papers on how humans actually learn — and what the data says about optimizing your study.

DAS3H: Optimal Scheduling with Multiple Skills (Choffin et al., 2019)

arXiv: 1905.06873 · EDM 2019

The problem with most spaced repetition systems: they treat every flashcard as a single isolated fact. But real knowledge involves multiple overlapping skills. A tax question about filing status might also draw on your understanding of dependents, standard deductions, and phaseout thresholds.

DAS3H models both memory decay AND the relationships between items and skills. Key finding: learning and forgetting curves differ by skill type. Some concepts decay faster than others. A one-size-fits-all review schedule leaves easy material over-reviewed and hard material under-reviewed.

Takeaway for EA prep: Not all tax topics are equally "sticky." Your review system should recognize that AMT phaseout rules need more frequent review than, say, the April 15 filing deadline. EA Coach's SRS tracks per-card performance and adjusts intervals accordingly.

The Phase Transition Problem (Reddy et al., 2016)

arXiv: 1602.07032 · KDD 2016

This paper mined real flashcard usage data and built a mathematical model of the Leitner box system. The headline finding: there's a sharp phase transition. Below a certain rate of new card introductions, learning works fine. Cross that threshold, and retention collapses — not gradually, but suddenly.

They verified this experimentally via Mechanical Turk. The implication: you can't just keep adding new cards indefinitely. There's a maximum sustainable rate, and exceeding it doesn't just slow you down — it breaks the system.

Takeaway for EA prep: Don't try to learn 50 new tax concepts in a day while also reviewing 200 old ones. There's a limit. EA Coach's daily caps (20 new / 150 reviews) keep you below the phase transition threshold.

Forgetting Curves Are Personal (Zaidi et al., 2020)

arXiv: 2004.11327 · AIED 2020

This study modeled forgetting curves for second-language vocabulary learners. The finding: word complexity matters enormously. Simple words are retained longer than complex ones. But more importantly, a neural network could learn to predict which words a specific student would forget and when.

The model incorporated both psychological features (prior exposures, time since last review) and linguistic features (word length, frequency, complexity). Combined, these features outperformed any single-factor model.

Takeaway for EA prep: Your forgetting curve for "standard deduction amounts" is probably different from your forgetting curve for "like-kind exchange rules." A smart system adapts. Raw Anki intervals are a starting point, not the final answer.

LLMs Can Generate Effective Practice Questions (An et al., 2025)

arXiv: 2507.05629 · 2025

This is a recent one. Researchers compared student learning outcomes with and without LLM-generated retrieval practice questions. Result: students with LLM-generated practice scored 89% accuracy on follow-up tests, compared to 73% for students without practice.

The catch: LLM-generated questions aren't perfect. Instructors still need to verify and revise them. But the time savings are enormous, and the learning benefit is real.

Takeaway for EA prep: This is exactly what EA Coach does — LLM-powered question grading and feedback. The research validates the approach: retrieval practice works, and automated generation makes it scalable.

Interleaving: Human Learning Applied to Machines (Ban & Xie, 2021)

arXiv: 2103.07018 · 2021

This paper took the human interleaving effect — mixing topics during study improves long-term retention — and applied it to training neural networks. The result: interleaved training of neural architectures outperformed blocked training.

The insight runs both ways. If interleaving helps machines learn better, it's because the underlying principle — forcing the learner to distinguish between different problem types — is fundamental, not just a human quirk.

Takeaway for EA prep: Don't study filing statuses for a week, then deductions for a week, then credits for a week. Mix them. The exam mixes them. Your practice should too.

Bottom line: The research converges on a few principles — space your practice, test yourself before you feel ready, mix your topics, and respect your brain's capacity limits. EA Coach implements these automatically so you can focus on the content, not the algorithm.

Papers Referenced

EA Exam Prep Resources